- U.S. Rep. John Peterson (PA-R-5th): “Additionally, under this proposal, an estimated $1.1 billion annually in debt free funding — $150 million more than Act 44 — will be expended to address the aging infrastructure of the commonwealth and to stabilize mass transit need for the foreseeable future.”
- State Rep. Steve Cappelli (R-Williamsport): “We’ve wasted enough time with Act. 44. It’s time now to act. If we say no to this, what have we accomplished with respect to infrastructure?”
- State Rep. Garth Everett (R-Muncy): “I’d like to have our transportation staff take a look at it...If it’s an alternative to tolling Interstate 80, I’m really interested.”
- State Rep. Mike Hanna (D-Lock Haven): “I think it’s a great deal...From the start, I said leasing the turnpike was a good idea.”
There are some significant advantages to the lease idea, the most important of which is that it would generate additional revenue to meet the transportation needs without establishing tolls on I-80. Moreover, the specifications for the bids established a guaranteed toll-increase schedule for the turnpike that the operator could not exceed. The I-80 toll plan, Act 44, includes no such cap for tolls on the turnpike or the interstate.
From an Editorial in the Patriot-News:
...several considerations lead us to the conclusion that it is the most realistic transportation-funding option available.
For starters, the Legislature is not going to resort to the usual and conventional means of meeting the state's transportation needs -- namely, higher fuel taxes and vehicle fees -- which would be our first choice.
Second, the current plan, known as Act 44, which rests to a large extent on tolling Interstate 80 to achieve its funding target, is just a bad idea.
On the finances behind leasing the Turnpike:
Under the proposal, Abertis Infraestructuras S.A. of Barcelona and Citi Infrastructure Investors of New York would pay $12.8 billion to lease the east-west turnpike and the northeast extension for 75 years. The total bid would be reduced by $2.3 billion to assume existing turnpike debt and other obligations. The remaining $10.5 billion would be invested in the Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System. Rendell says this investment would generate about $1.1 billion per year for transportation needs, based on average annual returns of 12 percent over the past 20 years.
No comments:
Post a Comment